A | Rising star Aneet Padda, who captured hearts with her debut in Saiyaara, the highest-grossing love story in Indian cinema, is now preparing for a different kind of challenge: her college final-year exams. The 22-year-old actor, hailed as the biggest Gen Z face in the country, will be appearing for her B.A. (Hons.) Political Science finals in December and January. A source close to the actor shared, “It’s inspiring how Aneet is managing everything so gracefully. Despite being a national sensation, she remains committed to her education. Her team is carefully structuring her schedule so she can focus on her exams while meeting professional commitments.; Following her record-breaking debut, Aneet Padda has been handpicked by Dinesh Vijan to lead his much-anticipated film Shakti Shalini, part of the Maddock Horror Comedy Universe (MHCU). The film, which she signed at just 22, makes her the youngest actor ever to headline a franchise in Indian cinema. An insider adds, “Aneet has an incredible work ethic. She has shown that success hasn’t changed her focus. Balancing college life and stardom isn’t easy, but she’s proving it’s possible with discipline and passion.”Released under Yash Raj Films, Saiyaara became an instant blockbuster and launched Aneet into superstardom alongside co-star Ahaan Panday. The film’s success has been compared to the iconic Kaho Naa... Pyaar Hai, making her debut one for the record books.Shakti Shalini is set to release on December 24, 2026, marking another milestone for Aneet, as the youngest actor to have a major Holiday release, a spot usually reserved for India’s biggest superstars.With her exams around the corner and a big-screen franchise waiting, Aneet Padda truly embodies the new-age Indian dream, balancing education, fame, and ambition with ease.ALos Read: Ayushmann Khurrana Welcomes Aneet Padda to MHCU As Shakti Shalini, Actress Responds。1月15日：据9to5Mac新闻报道，已知的第一起执法案件发生在几个月前的美国。联邦调查局要求嫌疑犯用身份证解锁他的手机。
B | 然而，在《福布斯》14日的一份报告中，加利福尼亚州一名法官裁定，政府不能强迫人们通过生物识别功能解锁他们的手机，即使他们有命令。在这起案件中，加利福尼亚州北部地区法院听取了警方的意见，他们正在寻求搜查令，作为Facebook敲诈案的一部分。
C | 案件中的受害者被要求支付一笔钱，以避免向公众发布“令人尴尬”的视频。执法当局想用搜查令来搜查他们认为在此案中的嫌疑人的财产。在一次突袭中，他们试图通过面部识别码和触摸识别码解锁嫌疑人的手机。法官同意警方有逮捕令，但无权强迫嫌疑人通过生物识别技术解锁他们的设备。
D | KandisWestmore法官表示，这一要求“过于宽泛，不能仅限于特定的人员或设备”。值得注意的是，如果执法机关要求更窄的逮捕令，这项特别裁决将来可能会被推翻。
E | 然而，更广泛地说，威斯特莫尔法官裁定，即使有逮捕令，也不能强迫嫌疑人通过人脸识别和触摸识别等生物识别技术来解开他们的罪行。法官在裁决中解释说，在解锁手机的情况下，指纹和面部识别与实物证据不同。
F | ”如果一个人因为证词交流而不能被强制提供密码，那么他就不能被强制提供指纹、虹膜、面部或其他生物特征识别功能来解锁同一个设备，”法官写道。
G | 韦斯特莫尔说，除了在突袭中发现的设备之外，还有其他方法可以访问“不违反第五修正案”所需的数据。这包括访问Facebook和请求访问Facebook信使对话。在去年10月的一份新闻报道中，联邦调查局要求嫌疑犯向iPhoneX展示自己的脸，以解锁手机。
H | 当时，《第五修正案》没有保护面部识别和触摸识别。威斯特莫尔法官的裁决将随着时间的推移而生效，理想情况下为用户提供与字母数字密码相同的面部识别和触摸ID法律保护。
Current article:http://www.zongchaeiwengshuabaisisuofu.sbs/list_txtvu/qqdvb.ppt
Published on:15:18:36
