作者：董文 来源：原创 发布日期：08-20
A | 8月26日讯 据英国媒体《每日镜报》报道，恩佐·费尔南德斯可能在夏窗最后阶段以1.2亿镑转会费加盟曼城。 NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。切尔西正为曼城提出报价而做准备，这将是曼城今夏最大的一笔交易。据说25岁的恩佐·费尔南德斯渴望转会曼城，这意味着他将与恩佐·马雷斯卡在阿提哈德重聚。切尔西希望在2023年为恩佐·费尔南德斯支付的1.06亿镑基础上盈利，还可能坚持要先找好替代者，再放他离队。切尔西曾与皇马中场卡马文加联系在一起，恩佐·费尔南德斯的转会交易会很复杂，但曼城准备推动交易成行。
B | 两周前切尔西为感兴趣俱乐部设定了1.2亿镑要价的严格截止期限，现已过期，但曼城准备在关窗前提交正式报价。
C | 恩佐·费尔南德斯上个赛季因与皇马暧昧一度遭遇队内停赛，他在切尔西一直感到不安定，周一晚他在英超比赛中替补出场时遭到富勒姆球迷的猛烈嘘声，这是对世界杯半决赛事件的回应。但有意思的是，切尔西球迷高唱恩佐·费尔南德斯的名字，主帅哈维·阿隆索本周也明确表示希望他的未来尽快明朗。
D | 阿隆索对BBC表示："在足球世界里，我对什么都不意外。我们拭目以待。我的愿望是我们能知道未来会发生什么，但要看这周的情况。"曼城在转会市场很活跃，已完成将萨维尼奥7500万镑卖给热刺的交易，还在与热刺就马尔穆什的转会进行谈判。罗德里、B席和赖因德斯已离队，尼科·冈萨雷斯可能被卖给纽卡。曼城已引进23岁的埃利奥特·安德森，即将从里尔签下布阿迪，马雷斯卡渴望与恩佐·费尔南德斯重聚。恩佐·费尔南德斯曾在马雷斯卡麾下赢得欧协联冠军、重返欧冠并夺得世俱杯冠军。
E |
Current article:http://www.zongchaeiwengshuabaisisuofu.sbs/s2s3ib8/ozqz5c.html
Published on:14:33:29